WASHINGTON - More than 75,000 Maryland residents were likely missed in
the 2000 census, according to one estimate, a shortfall that could cost
the state millions in federal funds that are based on population.
The U.S. Census Monitoring Board said Wednesday that the census missed
75,204 people in Maryland, the 13th-highest undercount rate in the
nation.
The Census Bureau conceded in February that it may have missed about
3.3 million people nationwide in the census, results of which it began
releasing in March. But while it concedes a nationwide undercount, the
bureau warned against trying to break down that number by city and state.
The national undercount rate of about 1.2 percent is an improvement
over the 1990 undercount of about 1.6 percent of the population.
For Maryland, the monitoring board's estimated undercount is also
better than in 1990, when the census said it missed 100,000 people, or
2.1 percent of the population. The 2000 undercount rate in Maryland was
estimated at 1.4 percent.
But the undercount could still mean millions of dollars lost, since
federal funding depends largely on population.
"These numbers influence welfare programs, social services and many
other projects," said Elizabeth Humphrey, a spokeswoman for the state's
planning department.
"Those undercounted are the people who need service assistance the
most."
Humphrey said Baltimore City would likely be hardest hit by an
undercount, because it is heavily populated with minorities who are most
often overlooked by the census.
It is too early to predict how much money, if any, the state might
lose from an undercount. But the state estimated that it lost more than
$100 million a year in federal funds because of the 100,000 missed by the
1990 census. About 65 percent of that "lost" money would have gone to
Baltimore.
"We know millions of people were missed, we know where they live, and
for the most part, we know they are disproportionately minority," said
Gilbert F. Casellas, presidential co-chair of the monitoring board.
Some of the federal programs tied to population include those that
give federal dollars to high-poverty school districts, health care
funding and job training programs.
"Thousands of people who qualify for these services will never get
these services because of the undercounts," said Charles Christian, an
urban geography professor at the University of Maryland.
Allan Lichtman, an American University history professor who has done
extensive research on undercounting for the census monitoring board, said
people missed by the census would affect Maryland in "every way."
"Policies are affected by the census figures" in aaddition to the
allocation of federal dollars, Lichtman said. "The 75,000 people not
counted . . . will force the state to lose a substantial amount of
money."
But Census Bureau officials said specific state and city undercount
numbers, this soon after the release of the census, are not reliable.
"It is important to note that the Census Bureau is not in a position
to release a final estimate for any state or city, and believes that the
most accurate data currently available are the unadjusted data already
released," said William G. Barron, the acting bureau director, in a
prepared statement.
Barron said the methodology that the monitoring board used to
calculate the undercounted figures was "seriously flawed," even though
both parties came up with the same undercounted figure nationwide.
The bureau is doing its own analysis of the undercount, but is not
ready to release that information yet, Barron said.
Copyright © 2001 University of Maryland College of Journalism.