Census 2000
Maryland Newsline Special Report

Politics

Business & Tech

Schools

Crime & Justice

Health

Et Cetera

Search the CNS print archives for other Census stories.

Census Shows State's Outer Suburbs Had Fastest Growth Rates in 1990s  

By Kate Alexander
Capital News Service
Monday, March 19, 2001

COLLEGE PARK, Md. - Maryland's population ebbed further outward from its central cities over the last decade, as the outer suburbs registered the greatest growth rates in the state and Baltimore continued to bleed people, according to census numbers released Monday.

Overall, the state population grew 10.8 percent from 1990 to 2000, when it hit 5,296,486 people, according to Census 2000, the official decennial head count of the nation.

Calvert County's population has grown 45.1 percent since 1990, far outstripping the overall state growth and topping all other counties' growth rate in the decennial head count, while Baltimore lost more than 11 percent of its population.

But while Calvert was growing the fastest, the inner suburbs of Washington, D.C., were growing the most. The Washington suburbs continued to be the center of the state's population, with Montgomery and Prince George's counties combining for more than 30 percent of the state's total population of nearly 5.3 million.

Montgomery County retained its position as the state's largest county with its 15.4 percent growth rate, an increase of 116,314 people to reach a 2000 population of 873,341.

Prince George's County grew by 72,247 to 801,515, a growth rate of 9.9 percent. The county overtook Baltimore City as the second-largest jurisdiction in the state.

That these inner suburbs continued their growth is "good news for Smart Growth," said Elizabeth Humphrey, spokeswoman for the state's planning office. "It means these already urbanized areas are strong and attracting new people."

Montgomery County's chief demographer, Drew Dedrick attributed that strength to an influx of Latino immigrants. He also noted that the county's growing minority population has not come at the expense of diversity, as the white population has held steady at over 60 percent.

In Calvert, the state's fastest-growing county, the welcomed rapid expansion is bringing new trials as well, said Greg Bowen, the county's deputy director of planning and zoning.

The new people moving to Calvert County are drawn by the rural character, quality schools, low crime rates and low taxes, Bowen said. But he noted that much of the rural charm that has attracted people in the first place is being consumed by subdivisions that are springing up to handle that growth.

The rest of Southern Maryland also experienced an surge in population. Charles County, for instance, grew 19.2 percent since 1990 and St. Mary's County grew 13.5 percent.

Steve Magoom, Charles County planning director, said that in the past the region has gone virtually "undiscovered, but that's changing."

The 32.9 percent rate of growth in Worcester County marked the greatest surprise in the state, coming in just behind Calvert in relative growth, said Humphrey. She also noted, however, that the steepness of the growth has to be put in the context of county's relatively small size -- Worcester's 2000 population was listed at 46,543.

The biggest victim of the decade's population change in Maryland was Baltimore, which had been projected to experience one of the country's biggest population drains. The city saw its population fall from 736,014 in 1990 to 651,154 in 2000. It also fell from second place in size among state jurisdictions to fourth place, behind Montgomery, Prince George's and Baltimore counties.

But the good news was that the loss, an 11.5 percent drop, was less than the 13 percent the state had anticipated, Humphrey said.

In fact, some neighborhoods in the city are not only stabilizing but also luring new people into the city, said planning director Charles Graves. He said growth in neighborhoods such as Federal Hill, Canton, Roland Park and Mount Washington has provided a "renewed sense of optimism."

But University of Maryland professor Charles Christian does not believe that difference represents a turning of the tide for Baltimore. Christian, an urban geographer, said that conditions in housing, education and crime have not changed enough to attract significant numbers into the city.

Tuesday's numbers, which include population figures by race, Hispanic ethnicity and voting age, will be used by the General Assembly to draw new legislative and congressional districts for the elections in 2002.

Copyright © 2001 University of Maryland College of Journalism.


Top of Page  |  Home Page