| Criminals Pay Big in Small
Counties
|
| Judges are handing out sentences
that show picturesque Washington County is a place criminals may want
to avoid. (Photo of Burnside Bridge courtesy Hagerstown
CVB)
|
By Maya Jackson
Capital News Service
Tuesday, May 1, 2001
ANNAPOLIS - Tourism officials tout Washington County as a Western
Maryland, small-town, vacation spot known for streams, orchards, mountains
and waterfalls -- but it could also be known for putting people behind
bars.
Judges there are giving out sentences that show this getaway town
could be a stay-away place for criminals.
Though it has six times fewer people than Maryland's most-populated
county, Montgomery, Washington judges sentenced almost twice as many men
and almost four times more women to the state prison system in 1999.
And Washington judges last year sent 73 more men and 25 more women to
state prison than Montgomery jurists did, according to a CNS analysis of
Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services data.
Washington and its sister small Maryland counties -- Dorchester,
Wicomico, Talbot, Worcester, Charles, Caroline and Somerset -- are
sending people to prison at higher rates than their urban siblings.
Sentencing experts say caseload congestion in populous areas may be
the culprit in the disparity.
"Baltimore City has enormous numbers . . . but when you have that many
people you can't send them all to prison," said Mike Connelly, executive
director of the Maryland State Commission on Criminal Sentencing Policy.
"They're already stacking them body on top of body. For Baltimore to do
what Wicomico would do would put the system into shock."
By far, Baltimore, Baltimore County and Prince George's County send
more sheer numbers of people to prison each year, but these jurisdictions
contain between 600,000 and 800,000 people each.
Based on percent of population, however, smaller counties have higher
sentencing rates.
Dorchester, for example, may be the state's largest county
geographically but it is more than 28 times smaller than Montgomery in
population. In 1999, its judges sent 10 women to prison compared to
Montgomery's eight women prisoners.
"Pretty unusual," said Jenni Gainsborough, senior policy analyst for
The Sentencing Project. "You usually see more people being sent to prison
in the counties that have big cities."
Montgomery County is unusual. It sends offenders to state prison at a
much lower rate, 0.21 prisoners per 1,000 county residents, than its
large-county peers, such as Baltimore County, which sends 1.27 people per
1,000 to state prison. Dorchester's rate is 2.25 per 1,000.
But experts say smaller counties have fewer alternatives to prison,
like drug treatment, job training, anger management and
violence-awareness programs. A longtime opponent of over-incarceration
especially for nonviolent offenses, the American Civil Liberties Union of
Maryland finds this "very troubling."
"We have long been concerned by the increasing numbers of crimes
requiring prison sentences -- particularly for nonviolent offenses," said
Suzanne Smith of the Maryland ACLU.
Montgomery County Circuit Judge Paul H. Weinstein, chairman of the
conference of all state circuit judges, declined to comment.
However, the county's state's attorney, Doug Gansler, had a lot to say
about his jurisdiction. Montgomery County is incomparable when it comes
to crime, Gansler said.
"We're an anomaly. We have far less crime and it's mind-boggling," he
said.
Last year, Montgomery County only had 15 murders, compared to the
District of Columbia, which had 300 murders and 300,000 fewer people.
Smaller counties, Gansler said, have a higher desire to more seriously
punish wrongdoers.
"Crime reverberates more loudly in a smaller county," he said.
That makes it sound like you get a break if you live in a larger
county, said Mike Maloney, Dorchester state's attorney for more than 22
years.
"Judges are impartial," he said, and equally aggressive across the
board.
"It's all about evidence and a jury. . .and the matter of the
temperament of the person who has the black robe on," he said. "Whether
judges in smaller counties have more time to sit there and deliberate
these sentences, I don't know."
But Maloney did say his smaller caseload makes way for more hands-on
involvement.
"I actually go to court. . . . I only have four assistants. We only
have one Circuit Court judge," he said.
While Montgomery County had about 4,848 criminal cases before the
Circuit Court last year, Dorchester only had about 652 and Talbot had
396.
"I talked to a Baltimore City Circuit judge who does 55 cases a day,"
said Connelly, of the city's backlog. "How much time can you spend
figuring out sentences . . . ?"
Not only does this caseload congestion affect key players of the
criminal justice system -- the public defenders, state's attorneys and
the judges - it delays the process to where "evidence may decay or
disappear and witnesses may move," said Connelly.
Together, this big-county backlog and small-county down-time are
making for comparable sentencing rates.
In 1999, Worcester -- with only 44,000 people -- sent just seven fewer
women to prison than Prince George's judges sent, even though Prince
George's then had nearly 17 times more people.
And Wicomico last year, with about 84,000 people, sent only one fewer
woman than Prince George's, which has eight times more people.
But when asked whether to call this a problem or not, Connelly didn't
give a direct answer.
"I hesitate. . .It's not my position. It really depends on the
public's point of view and if the public wants all offenders who commit
the same crime to get the same sentence, then this is a problem."
Copyright © 2001 University of Maryland College of
Journalism
Top of Page | Home Page
|